<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Classroom2.0: Avoiding the &#8220;creepy treehouse&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://melaniemcbride.net/2008/04/26/creepy-treehouse-v-digital-literacies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://melaniemcbride.net/2008/04/26/creepy-treehouse-v-digital-literacies/</link>
	<description>educational web strategy + consulting</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Lott</title>
		<link>http://melaniemcbride.net/2008/04/26/creepy-treehouse-v-digital-literacies/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 20:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://melaniemcbride.net/2008/04/26/creepy-treehouse-v-digital-literacies/#comment-176</guid>
		<description>Yes, by definition, creating a "Creepy Treehouse" is bad pedagogy. And I think your "50 years out of date" number is a bit conservative. Try 100 years or more.

I left other comments on John Connell's post. I don't think we disagree, nor do I think Jared is advocating staying away from these technologies as a solution.

I do have issues with the idea that creating environments that allow for "hanging out" is a problem. In fact, I would submit that if that element isn't *facilitated* in addition to learning, then it is likely to fail. I point also to Rheingold's teaching environment in support of that notion. Perhaps we differ on "hanging out," but taking the "social" out of social systems seems precisely the wrong way to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, by definition, creating a &#8220;Creepy Treehouse&#8221; is bad pedagogy. And I think your &#8220;50 years out of date&#8221; number is a bit conservative. Try 100 years or more.</p>
<p>I left other comments on John Connell&#8217;s post. I don&#8217;t think we disagree, nor do I think Jared is advocating staying away from these technologies as a solution.</p>
<p>I do have issues with the idea that creating environments that allow for &#8220;hanging out&#8221; is a problem. In fact, I would submit that if that element isn&#8217;t *facilitated* in addition to learning, then it is likely to fail. I point also to Rheingold&#8217;s teaching environment in support of that notion. Perhaps we differ on &#8220;hanging out,&#8221; but taking the &#8220;social&#8221; out of social systems seems precisely the wrong way to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Connell &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Get out of the creepy treehouse!</title>
		<link>http://melaniemcbride.net/2008/04/26/creepy-treehouse-v-digital-literacies/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>John Connell &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Get out of the creepy treehouse!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://melaniemcbride.net/2008/04/26/creepy-treehouse-v-digital-literacies/#comment-174</guid>
		<description>[...] blog-search in my RSS feed gave me a link to Melanie McBride&#8217;s post on Classroom 2.0: Avoiding the &#8216;Creepy Treehouse&#8217;, and then on to Jared Stein&#8217;s post on Defining &#8220;Creepy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blog-search in my RSS feed gave me a link to Melanie McBride&#8217;s post on Classroom 2.0: Avoiding the &#8216;Creepy Treehouse&#8217;, and then on to Jared Stein&#8217;s post on Defining &#8220;Creepy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
