<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Attention and dissonance in the age of social media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://melaniemcbride.net/2009/01/27/attention-and-dissonance-in-the-age-of-social-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://melaniemcbride.net/2009/01/27/attention-and-dissonance-in-the-age-of-social-media/</link>
	<description>inclusive digital learning + play</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 16:44:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Attention, Dissonance, and Beginner&#8217;s Mind - Graveyard Contemplations</title>
		<link>http://melaniemcbride.net/2009/01/27/attention-and-dissonance-in-the-age-of-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-857</link>
		<dc:creator>Attention, Dissonance, and Beginner&#8217;s Mind - Graveyard Contemplations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://melaniemcbride.net/?p=420#comment-857</guid>
		<description>[...] Ian on Jan.31, 2009, under Psychology Melanie McBride has an excellent, utterly excellent post relating education, inattention in class, and cognitive [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ian on Jan.31, 2009, under Psychology Melanie McBride has an excellent, utterly excellent post relating education, inattention in class, and cognitive [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avi</title>
		<link>http://melaniemcbride.net/2009/01/27/attention-and-dissonance-in-the-age-of-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-695</link>
		<dc:creator>Avi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://melaniemcbride.net/?p=420#comment-695</guid>
		<description>Really interesting post.  I&#039;m starting to see how this is crossing into the workforce.  If everyone in a meeting is doing something else, is the meeting really happening?  
I remember in 2001 attending executive team meetings where everyone but the person speaking was on their Blackberry.  You can guess at the effectiveness of those meetings.  I brought in a newspaper one day and starting reading it.  When I got called on it, I told the chair of the meeting that I was still listening just like everyone on the Blackberry.  They were banned from then on for that meeting.  
I know the genie is out of the bottle and that we&#039;re past the time of technology bans but I truly believe that while some of us are good at multi-tasking and can do many things at once, the majority of us are not.  
Sure meetings may not always be engaging but my view is that I was invited for a reason and in a work setting I am being paid to attend and need to show value for that time by contributing actively, not when I tune back in.  My gut says that over time as we expand our use of collaboration tools beyond face-to-face meetings, the time when we do come face-to-face will need to be time well spent and those who aren&#039;t really &quot;present&quot; may find themselves uninvited the next time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really interesting post.  I&#8217;m starting to see how this is crossing into the workforce.  If everyone in a meeting is doing something else, is the meeting really happening?<br />
I remember in 2001 attending executive team meetings where everyone but the person speaking was on their Blackberry.  You can guess at the effectiveness of those meetings.  I brought in a newspaper one day and starting reading it.  When I got called on it, I told the chair of the meeting that I was still listening just like everyone on the Blackberry.  They were banned from then on for that meeting.<br />
I know the genie is out of the bottle and that we&#8217;re past the time of technology bans but I truly believe that while some of us are good at multi-tasking and can do many things at once, the majority of us are not.<br />
Sure meetings may not always be engaging but my view is that I was invited for a reason and in a work setting I am being paid to attend and need to show value for that time by contributing actively, not when I tune back in.  My gut says that over time as we expand our use of collaboration tools beyond face-to-face meetings, the time when we do come face-to-face will need to be time well spent and those who aren&#8217;t really &#8220;present&#8221; may find themselves uninvited the next time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dancing Monkey Mania &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2009-01-28</title>
		<link>http://melaniemcbride.net/2009/01/27/attention-and-dissonance-in-the-age-of-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-690</link>
		<dc:creator>Dancing Monkey Mania &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2009-01-28</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://melaniemcbride.net/?p=420#comment-690</guid>
		<description>[...] Attention and dissonance in the age of social media at melanie mcbride online This makes a lot of sense to me. Resonates with my philosophy and creeping technological determinism&#8230; (tags: attention cognitive_dissonance multitasking cognition) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Attention and dissonance in the age of social media at melanie mcbride online This makes a lot of sense to me. Resonates with my philosophy and creeping technological determinism&#8230; (tags: attention cognitive_dissonance multitasking cognition) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/


Served from: melaniemcbride.net @ 2012-05-17 08:13:41 -->
