Archive for the 'Best practices' Category

Social media: Essential user controls

What are the most essential user controls for social media?

NOTE: When I created this little poll it was my first time using poll daddy. I configured it to allow people to choose more than one option. I’m not sure the results say as much as I’d like them to. Thanks to all who participated in the experiment. Next one will be better.

What is your ideal vision of a social media network? Think about what’s presently available and consider how you might change it to better suit your own needs. Drop your ideas into a comment below. I will aggregate your responses into a single post and twitter, delicious and RSS the results.

[steal] My Social Media Policy

Despite the popularity and widespread adoption of social tools, there’s little agreement when it comes to matters of our individual terms of use. Without a collective social contract for social media, many of us are left wondering: How do I define my own social policy? Until now, corporate social media developers are defining those policies for us. Some of us feel it’s time we defined social media according to our our own terms.

In 2007, Joseph Smarr, Marc Canter, Robert Scoble, and Michael Arrington created A Bill of Rights for Users of the Social Web. Their bill was intended to “spur conversation and debate” around the need for users to be more proactive about the ownership and use of their personal social media content. For example, the right to:

“Allow their users to syndicate their own profile data, their friends list, and the data that’s shared with them via the service, using a persistent URL or API token and open data formats.”

I was inspired to extend this idea to speak to the more elusive question of social granularity. For example, to define my own policies around connecting, professionalism and signal to noise. The need to define these things along more personal terms was the basis for developing my own policy for social networking and media.

The following is a template based on my own personal Social Media Policy (SMP) for you to hack and remix. As ever, the content, tone and format is entirely up to you.

Continue reading ‘[steal] My Social Media Policy’

Teaching and learning 2.0: Turn up the good, turn down the suck

 

 

University of Texas professor David Parry is my idea of the future of education. According to Parry:

“The more we try to put those walls up, and say “I’m a professor, I only talk inside the class” the more irrelevant we become.”

I cannot agree more. This is what Paulo Freire was talking about when he talked about pedagogies of praxis (action v. theory). Especially in relation to the web. Continue reading ‘Teaching and learning 2.0: Turn up the good, turn down the suck’

How not to be a blowhard: Best practices for lifecasting

seesmic1.jpg

The many-to-many conversation model of Seesmic.

This weekend, I spent some more time exploring the content at YLive and Seesmic. While YLive allows for the immediacy of live streaming, it leaves a lot to be desired in terms of noise to signal. Seesmic, on the other is rich in maturity, civility and kindness - all qualities that build trust and community (though this could change when alpha goes more public). I could write more about the pros and cons of each but what interests me more is this: what makes for a meaningful broadcast?

I spent a bit of time meditating on this and have come up with a few strategies of my own. Read on …

Continue reading ‘How not to be a blowhard: Best practices for lifecasting’

Howard Rheingold on “way-new” collaboration

Recorded in 2005, Howard Rheingold talks about the critical importance of collaboration, participatory media and collective action in shaping a better and more effective world. Great historical examples of human interdependence, cooperation, helping and other civilised behaviours that helped humans to thrive and survive through adversity - all alternatives to more destructive models that have obscured reason, ethics and the simple logic of alternatives. See a complete screencast (animated visuals with voice over) here.

I suggest we honour this talk - and items like it - with the following delicious tag: “newway”

Howard has been a formative figure in my thinking about the relationship between community and reciprocity - and how all of us can contribute to the world in unique and positive ways (if only we choose to).

Our data, ourselves: The User Bill of Rights


Lawrence Lessig on creativity2.0 and the law

I used to think standards were for squares. Especially when it came to the wild web. That was back in early days of my online life, before I knew about Creative Commons, Lawrence Lessig and Open Source. At that time, I didn’t realise that (democratic and fair) freedom of expression was not incompatible with (democractic and fair) standards of use. And, like many people, I didn’t regard myself as a stakeholder or participant in the development of those standards.

And then I realised there were a whole lot of people who did believe they had a stake in how their information was distributed. Ordinary citizens and professional content producers alike were taking part in a user revolution that defied the top down models of the past. And everywhere I looked, the early adopters were having important conversations about what they would and would not accept. That was 2003 when social networking services were starting to emerge as the_next_big_thing and open source models of thinking and creating were starting to take hold.

A message to the late majority: Define and demand your rights

Read on …

Continue reading ‘Our data, ourselves: The User Bill of Rights’

Cater to the web2.0 user-reader (or perish)

nnono.jpg

The aptly titled “you don’t understand our audience”

Today while I was surfing through the most popular delicious links, I found this article (above). It’s about — well, I don’t actually know what it’s about because the content was locked behind a registration field.

CONTINUE READING below

Continue reading ‘Cater to the web2.0 user-reader (or perish)’

Happiness: The ultimate best practice

I think happiness is the ultimate best practice. And it does take practice. TED speakers Dan Gilbert and Buddhist monk Matthieu Ricard explain.

(the delightful) Dan Gilbert
Psychologist Dan Gilbert says happiness is not what we think. Sorry VISA, but according to hard science, we really can’t buy happiness. In fact, not getting what you want is the key to your well being. A funny and synapse-firing good TED talk.

(the mindful) Matthieu Ricard
Buddhist monk and former molecular biologist Matthieu Ricard also says happiness is not what we think. Find out why science and Buddhism aren’t so far apart when it comes to definitions of well being. Inspiring, thoughtful and simple wisdom fresh from the Himalayas.

* * *

Thanks to fellow K2 enthusiast Robert Anselm for the wonderful TED plugin!